Difference between revisions of "NTS ABSTRACTFall2019"
Shusterman (talk | contribs) (→Sep 5) |
Shusterman (talk | contribs) (→Sep 5) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Return to [https://www.math.wisc.edu/wiki/index.php/NTS ] | Return to [https://www.math.wisc.edu/wiki/index.php/NTS ] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Sep 5 == | ||
| + | |||
| + | <center> | ||
| + | {| style="color:black; font-size:100%" table border="2" cellpadding="10" width="700" cellspacing="20" | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#F0A0A0" align="center" style="font-size:125%" | '''Will Sawin''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" align="center" | The sup-norm problem for automorphic forms over function fields and geometry | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | bgcolor="#BCD2EE" | | ||
| + | The sup-norm problem is a purely analytic question about | ||
| + | automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when | ||
| + | viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe | ||
| + | a new approach to this problem in the function field setting, which we | ||
| + | carry through to provide new bounds for forms in GL_2 stronger than | ||
| + | what can be proved for the analogous question about classical modular | ||
| + | forms. This approach proceeds by viewing the automorphic form as a | ||
| + | geometric object, following Drinfeld. It should be possible to prove | ||
| + | bounds in greater generality by this approach in the future. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |} | ||
| + | </center> | ||
| + | |||
| + | <br> | ||
== Sep 5 == | == Sep 5 == | ||
Revision as of 09:53, 7 September 2019
Return to [1]
Sep 5
| Will Sawin |
| The sup-norm problem for automorphic forms over function fields and geometry |
|
The sup-norm problem is a purely analytic question about automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe a new approach to this problem in the function field setting, which we carry through to provide new bounds for forms in GL_2 stronger than what can be proved for the analogous question about classical modular forms. This approach proceeds by viewing the automorphic form as a geometric object, following Drinfeld. It should be possible to prove bounds in greater generality by this approach in the future. |
Sep 5
| Will Sawin |
| The sup-norm problem for automorphic forms over function fields and geometry |
|
The sup-norm problem is a purely analytic question about automorphic forms, which asks for bounds on their largest value (when viewed as a function on a modular curve or similar space). We describe a new approach to this problem in the function field setting, which we carry through to provide new bounds for forms in GL_2 stronger than what can be proved for the analogous question about classical modular forms. This approach proceeds by viewing the automorphic form as a geometric object, following Drinfeld. It should be possible to prove bounds in greater generality by this approach in the future. |
